About | Dead Links |
About | Cache Copy | Cache Copy N/A |
Reports | By Company Name |
April Reports Received: 16
April Deaths: 4
Accident Reports Received for 2001: 47
Deaths to date for 2001: 13
Late reports are included in the above numbers.
The above numbers are global.
| According to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, an average of 71 people are killed in crane related accidents in the United States each year. |
Statistics for prior years
ATTENTION! The numbers above indicate there is a great need for more training and safety awareness. Anyone having anything to do with cranes should take heed. The majority of the accidents were caused by human error. Translation: smart people doing dumb things.
Enhanced Reports — April 2001
04/27/01: Hong Kong — Fear grips school after crane hits playground | Dead Link | | Cache Copy below |
Students, parents and teachers of a Tin Shui Wai primary school are living in fear after a 10-metre-high crane toppled onto their playground.
No one was injured when the crane came to rest less than a metre above an area often crowded with hundreds of children. The accident happened over the Easter holiday.
But the school, just metres away from the Tin Shui Wai Westrail construction site, has accused the developer - the Kowloon-Canton Railway Corporation - of breaking a promise not to resume construction before putting extra safety measures in place.
Queen Elizabeth School Old Students' Association Branch Primary School principal Chui Wai-ling told Sing Tao Daily - Hong Kong iMail's sister publication - that she was disappointed when the developer resumed construction after promising not to.
“On school days, hundreds of students would gather in that spot. Luckily there weren't any students on the playground that day,” Ms Chui said.
“The KCRC promised they would not resume construction before setting up a thicker brick wall dividing the school and the site, but they have broken their promise.”
She said the developer blamed a “communication misunderstanding”.
Westrail KCRC yesterday denied construction had resumed without the school's consent.
“The contractor was just moving the crane away. The employees who were responsible for the incident have already been fired,” a spokesman said.
On the morning of Saturday, April 14, the crane toppled over after driving over a pothole.
Ms Chui said the KCRC had removed the crane the same day and rebuilt the school's outside wall, so she had decided to deal with the matter quietly. She said the KCRC had promised a few days ago to resume major construction only after reaching an agreement with the school and the parents on the building of a thicker wall between the school and the building site.
“In the meantime, they promised not to resume construction half an hour before and one hour after school, but they failed to keep their promise,” she said. Part of the playground had been cordoned off, and the school had ordered the students away from the area.
Ms Chui said the school would meet KCRC representatives this morning to try to find a solution. “I'm really disappointed that such a reputable company could be so irresponsible,” she said. “As far as the safety of teachers and students goes, I will not believe them any more.”
A Westrail KCRC spokesman said the contractor had conducted a review immediately after the incident and also reported it to the Labour Department. |
04/27/01: Location and exact date of this incident is unknown at this time.
Operator Alert! Critical checkpoint, potential hazard, warnings, etc. Typical Alert
It is reported the operator was pouring concrete with a two-yard bucket. He boomed down beyond safe radius and the crane began to tip. He then tried to swing away from the building and side loaded the boom and you can see the result. The crane is a Manitowoc model 222 111.
See photos (3)
Name on crane: All Crane Rental 5/11/01 Note: As per the letter below, the crane was on bare rental.
Received the following, on May 11, 2001 in reference to the above *original* unedited report.
Dear Doyle,
This letter is in response to an accident that appeared on your website. Craneaccidents.com had photographs of a crane accident that occurred on 4/27/01 posted on their website. In the description of the accident the following was stated:
"It is reported the operator was pouring concrete with a two-yard bucket. He boomed down beyond safe radius and the crane began to tip. He then tried to swing away from the building and side loaded the boom and you can see the result."
This was a far from accurate statement as to the cause of the accident. The crane that was involved in this accident belonged to my client, and I performed the accident investigation on behalf of my client. For the record the Operator involved in this accident was not an employee of my client, he was provided by the rental client. The statement mentioned above is not accurate to the cause of the accident at all. The Operator was working at a safe load radius, and he was well within the capacities that are stipulated in the load charts for that crane.
The theory that the boom was side-loaded by the 2-yard concrete bucket is preposterous as well. During the course of the investigation the load being lifted was estimated high at 1500 lbs. In the load charts for the load radius the Operator was working at the net capacity was nearly doubled that amount. At the time of accident high winds were not an issue so the side loading of the boom theory is not consistent with the findings that were found during the course of the investigation.
The true cause of the accident was determined to be ground failure. This is not shown in the photographs on your web site because the photographs were taken by a bystander apparently, who was not involved in this investigation, and who got their information second hand from personnel on the project that were not aware of the facts involved in this case. The information posted on your web site reflects poorly on my client who is dedicated to crane safety on all projects on which their cranes are placed.
On behalf of my client and myself I am asking that craneaccidents.com print a retraction on their web site noting the true cause of this accident. This would be greatly appreciated. It is also suggested that in the future craneaccidents.com exercise caution in displaying theories on their web site that are not backed up with evidence, and that are given by people that are not involved in the accident investigation.
Your web site does print excellent information, and it is obvious that its founders are dedicated to strive for crane safety so accidents like this one, and others can be prevented. My client and myself could not agree with craneaccidents.com more on these points.
Your cooperation in getting the truth across for this accident would be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Investigator <Real mame deleted by Peeks>
Reply by Peeks: Investigator, First I want to say I do everything I possibly can to publish the truth. However, I can't physically visit every crane accident location and interview those involved and make my own determination as to what actually happened. I rely on those who send me the reports to send true and reliable reports. For most part I think they do an excellent job. Further, I realize the reports may not always be accurate, thus the disclaimer which has been posted on the site since its launch date on January 27, 1999.
Secondly, as to the cause of the accident referenced above. What you wrote above is only your theory or conclusion. Some other investigator(s) may differ with your conclusion.
Investigator, you wrote, "The true cause of the accident was determined to be ground failure."
Investigator, contrary to your conclusion, "ground failure" never has been, nor will it ever be the cause of a crane accident. The failure is on the part of the operator when he/she fails to determine the ground conditions and factor those conditions into their calculations before making a lift. If the existing ground conditions are not known, a soil test should be performed.
You also said, "The Operator was working at a safe load radius, and he was well within the capacities that are stipulated in the load charts for that crane." My question is, did the operator know the ground conditions were poor and factor them into his calculations? If not, why not? To the best of my knowledge, ALL load charts are based on the crane being near level, usually within 1 percent, and on firm ground.
If the operator knew the ground was not firm, why wasn't the crane sitting on mats? Why did he make the lift if he knew the ground conditions were poor or less than firm as required? If he guessed and guessed wrong, then he paid the consequences of guessing or assuming the crane was on firm ground.
Also, you stated, "At the time of accident high winds were not an issue so the side loading of the boom theory is not consistent with the findings that were found during the course of the investigation." Investigator, High winds were not mentioned in the original report nor was it in anyway suggested that such may have contributed to the side-loading of the boom. I would like to know if high winds have to be present to cause side-loading?
"It is also suggested that in the future craneaccidents.com exercise caution in displaying theories on their web site that are not backed up with evidence, and that are given by people that are not involved in the accident investigation."
Investigator, speaking of evidence versus theories, where is your evidence? All I've seen is your theory and your opinions.
If I'm wrong on this I will certainly make apologies and retract my statements.
I do agree with you about us having a mutual interest in crane safety and presenting truth. In finality, that's what this site is all about. So, since the above is based on what I received in the original report and on your theory of what happened, I think it would be good to get some commentary about this incident from others in the trade.
Lastly, it is not my intent to bash anyone nor any company. I just call the shots as I see them. Sometimes the truth hurts. If that's the case, then so be it.
|
04/24/01: Wilton, Australia —
Four airlifted to hospital after crane strikes overhead wires | Dead Link | | Cache Copy below |
Four people were injured in an explosion when a mobile crane struck overhead wires west of Sydney this morning.
An ambulance spokesman said the crane hit the wires, which were carrying 33,000 volts.
The accident happened just after 8am at a construction site on Picton Road at Cordeaux Dam in Wilton, near Picton.
Two people were in a serious condition with shrapnel wounds to their legs and would be transferred to Liverpool Hospital by helicopter, the spokesman said.
Two others were being taken to Liverpool Hospital by ambulance in a stable condition.
From ABC News Seven injured after crane hits power lines | Dead Link | | Cache Copy |
This is the 7th power line accident reported to this site this year, 4 this month, one yesterday and yet another one today. Again, all were avoidable.
Just follow one simple safety rule. DO NOT work cranes near energized power lines. What's so difficult about obeying that safety rule? |
04/23/01: Columbia, Missouri —
Subcontractor electrocuted at site of gas turbine project | Cache Copy |
The worker who died from electrocution has been identified as Allen Everett, 47, of Buffalo, Missouri, according to a statement from the Columbia Fire Department.
Everett, an employee of the Bradon Co., was holding onto steel cables attached to a crane when the crane came into contact with power lines at a construction site at 5700 Peabody Road. The lines were estimated to carry nearly 14,000 volts.
Bradon was under contract to prepare the site for a gas turbine power plant under construction by Ameren Energy Development Co.
This is the 6th power line accident reported to this site this year, 3 this month. Again, all were avoidable.
|
04/21/01: Chesterfield, Virginia — Highway project worker is killed | Dead Link | | Cache Copy N/A |
A 36-year-old construction worker was killed Tuesday at the Interstate 895 highway project in Chesterfield County when he was struck by a support beam that fell from a crane.
Isaias Martinez Hernandez of the 1000 block of McKenzie Street in Petersburg was standing in the bed of a pickup truck about 5:15 p.m. when he was hit by the falling 5-foot-long beam, state police spokeswoman Corinne Geller said. Hernandez worked for Recchi American, Inc. This is a Fluor Daniel and Morrison Knudsen project.
04/21/01: Why did the beam fall off crane? | Dead Link | | Cache Copy below |
Questions still unanswered in worker's death
BY TY BOWERS
TIMES-DISPATCH STAFF WRITER Apr 20, 2001
Investigators know what killed construction worker Isaias Martinez Hernandez at the Route 895 highway project in Chesterfield County.
But they don't know why it happened.
Hernandez was cleaning out the bed of a pickup truck at 5:15 p.m. Tuesday when a 5-foot-long, 500-pound support beam fell on top of him from a nearby crane.
Officials from the U.S. Labor Department's Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the Virginia Department of Transportation are still investigating what caused the crane to drop the beam that killed 36-year-old Hernandez.
They'll work as long as it takes to get an answer, said Herbert Morgan, the Route 895 project director.
Morgan served as a spokesman for Fluor Daniel and Morrison Knudsen - two private companies partnered to head the state-funded project, known as the Pocahontas Parkway.
Morgan said all crane operations at the site will cease while officials investigate, but other work will continue.
“We express our deepest sympathy to the family,” he said.
Hernandez's widow, Ines Martinez-Reyes, lives in a small town near Oaxaca, Mexico, with the couple's three children, ages 13, 11 and 3, said state police spokeswoman Corinne Geller. Since 1999, Hernandez had worked for Recchi American Inc. - one of the Pocahontas project's nearly 30 subcontractors.
The company also employs Hernandez's brother, Javier Barboza , and his uncle, Virginio Martinez-Hernandez . Two of Hernandez's other brothers also work at the site. None of them could be reached.
Emillio Roseillo, a vice president with Recchi, said, “I personally express our deepest sorrow to the family for the loss of Isaias.”
Roseillo, who flew up from the company's Miami headquarters yesterday, stressed that worker safety is Recchi's chief concern. Recchi will cooperate fully in the investigation as well as conduct its own, Roseillo said.
“The job [at Route 895] is under our strict scrutiny,” he added.
One other worker has died at the site since work began nearly three years ago.
In December 1999, Israel Hernandez Cruz , 27, died when reinforcing rods collapsed on him as he worked on the parkway's bridge, which will span the James River when completed.
Fluor Daniel and Morrison Knudsen were cited for an OSHA violation in that accident and fined $7,000. “They are contesting that fine,” said Karen Lutto, a spokeswoman for the two companies.
Recchi also landed a $2,250 OSHA fine for the 1999 fatality, which involved a worker employed by one of its subcontractors, Roseillo said.
Central Virginia's largest highway project currently under way, the 8.8-mile Pocahontas Parkway will connect the Chippenham Parkway in Chesterfield to interstates 295 and 64 in Henrico County and will cost an estimated $324 million.
“We take our safety very seriously,” Morgan said, but “there's inherent danger in what we do.”
|
04/20/01: Anchorage, Alaska — Roofer injured in hotel accident | Dead Link | | Cache Copy |
A construction accident at the Northern Lights Hotel sent a roofer to the hospital Thursday afternoon.
The accident caused a supply hoist to dangle precariously off the side of the hotel before it was stabilized.
|
04/17/01: Georgetown, Texas —
This accident probably occurred on 4-05-01. It is reported that the operator tried to reach one more spot before moving the machine. They were picking a 875 pound air unit when it happened at a Georgetown School District project.
See Photo #1 of 5 (very nice pics)
United Crane, Inc.
04/18/01 Unverified report received: United Crane turned a 75 ton truck crane over in their yard by high booming the hydraulic with no rear outriggers extended but heavy damage was done to the jib. In regards to the United Crane accident in Georgetown, the crane was taken to their Houston shop for repairs and the rear outrigger beams were removed and they ran the front outriggers out and scoped the #1 section out and turned it over again. That's 2 cranes damaged within a weeks time. |
 04/13/01: Huntington Beach, California — 1 Killed, 1 Hurt When Tree Hits Power Lines
| Dead Link | | Cache Copy |
A Huntington Beach plant nursery employee was electrocuted
Thursday and a co-worker hospitalized with burns after a tree they were moving became tangled in overhead power lines, authorities said.
The man killed was identified as Mario Negrete, 51, of Stanton.
This is the 5th power line accident reported to this site this year. Again, all were avoidable.
|
04/13/01: El Jobean, Florida — Worker injured by cable on El Jobean bridge | Cache Copy |
Although the linked article doesn't mention a crane being involved, this was a crane related accident. The project is less than 10 miles from my home so I drove out there today and talked with several of the guys on the job.
Since the cause of the accident is still under investigation, those I talked to didn't care to discuss the details.
The Misener Marine owned crane was lifting heavy concrete panels during a jetting process when the accident happened. It appears a lifting cable snapped and fell on the worker below.
The injured man is out of the hospital and on the mend. —Doyle Peeks
|
04/10/01: New York, New York — Firefighters claw worker out of debris | Dead Link | | Cache Copy N/A |
Digging quickly through debris, at times with just their bare
hands, rescue workers heroically saved a grapple operator
buried beneath a potentially deadly mountain of steel and
concrete yesterday.
Firefighters lift grapple operator Ragnauth Jairan to safety from pile of twisted steel and concrete that fell on him at Creedmoor Psychiatric Center construction site yesterday.
The victim, Ragnauth Jairan, 31, was rushed to North Shore University Hospital at Manhasset, where he was in stable condition.
Police said Jairan suffered several broken bones when he was pinned in the cab of his vehicle by debris he was clearing from a demolition site.
Shortly after noon, police emergency service units and firefighters were called to the Creedmoor Psychiatric Center site on Commonwealth Blvd., Bellerose, where a building was being demolished to make room for three new public schools.
There they found Jairan, a grapple operator with Condor Associates, trapped under bricks and steel beams from a wall that was being removed. The grapple is a clawlike attachment on a crane that grabs and lifts debris.
"He was crushed under massive amounts of concrete and two steel I-beams," said Sgt. James Buscemi, who with about 10 other officers lifted chunks of the wall off Jairan's legs and head.
"Naturally, he was screaming for us to get him out. I told him not to worry, and that he'll get home tonight," Buscemi added.
After removing the heaviest rubble, rescuers brought in heavy-duty power saws and hydraulic spreaders to extract Jairan from the cab, which had been smashed into a cage of twisted metal.
"His legs were twisted underneath him in a space not even big enough for a child," said Emergency Service officer Michael Laxton. "We had to be very careful and precise because any wrong move could aggravate his injuries."
To make matters worse, thick mud at the construction site prevented the police and fire departments from bringing in more powerful and efficient rescue equipment, said Deputy Fire Chief Stanley Dawe.
"We didn't have much time to think about what to do about the mud," he said. "These men just got in there with their bare hands and started digging."
"The operation went well because it was a joint effort," said Emergency Service officer Stephen Bilhar.
School Construction Authority officials have stopped work at the Creedmoor site to conduct a full investigation into the accident, said spokesman Dan McCormack. |
04/10/01: Boston, Massachusetts — A large crane on the Big Dig project lost its concrete footing Saturday morning, forcing the temporary shutdown of Atlantic Avenue.
The concrete support beneath the left side tracks of the crane gave way about 3 a.m. By noon, workers had shored up the concrete supports and the crane had been righted.
See Related Topic (Crane Foundation Load Analyis)
|
04/06/01: Dulles, Virginia — Power failure does damage to AOL services | Dead Link | | Cache Copy |
The power outage occurred at Dominion Virginia Power, a unit of Richmond, Virginia based Dominion Resources Inc. A crane came into contact with a 230-kilovolt transmission line
Power line accident #4 for the year 2000. All were avoidable |
|